Cleveland CG10 56 and 60

[tickyboy]

Going to try and sell again...

Cleveland CG10 56 and 60 wedges, used 1.5 seasons, so there is face, sole, and bag wear. There seems to be some kind of rock ding on the face of the 56 near the hosel, doesn't affect playability.

$155 shipped to GTA, sorry no trades.

[tickyboy]

Thought these were sold, apparently not....

$125 + shipping (own method picked), again no trades.

[newgolfer]

Sorry to back out of the deal. I was told by the seller that these wedges were 8/10 condition (this was before had a look at this thread and saw the pics).

Clearly the SW is not 8/10 condition so i backed out.

[tickyboy]

Don't know how someone would contact me about these wedges and not see the pics in the thread, anyway might as well keep, they're in fine condition for me.

[newgolfer]

Don't know how someone would contact me about these wedges and not see the pics in the thread, anyway might as well keep, they're in fine condition for me.

I sent you a PM based on what you posted in this thread

http://www.torontogolfnuts.com/showthread.php?t=3644


Have the following right handed:

Bridgestone J33R 9.5* ZCOM TW-74X

Cleveland CG10 56 and 60 low bounce

Callaway I-Trax 35" mint

Cleveland COMP 9.5* Diamana 63X at 47"

Looking for wedges, Pro Platinum newports, rescue mid TP 14 or 16*, r7 15* 3 wood

Notice the bold?

That being said. I dont know how anyone could think that those wedges are 8/10 condition. If I had gone thru with the transaction I would have been very disappointed by your description in the PM.

[tickyboy]

I would rate the wedges still 8/10, there is face and sole wear. The early cg10s finish wore easily, showing the brown/copper look. Besides the small rock mark on the 56 the grooves are excellent.

[Rocknronny]

I would rate the wedges still 8/10, there is face and sole wear. The early cg10s finish wore easily, showing the brown/copper look. Besides the small rock mark on the 56 the grooves are excellent.Sorry but they only look like maybe 6/10 INHO..

[Bellyhungry]

Sorry but they only look like maybe 6/10 INHO..
That little 'nick' mark does change the grove configuration/face of the wedge though. Does that not make it illegal accoridng to the rules of golf?

[sharkhark]

The face of the 60 isn't shown, so the rating is impossible to say. The 56 has a substantial impact. I would call it a gouge more than a nick. According to ebay sites where i buy alot of golf equip, it would rate around a 4 as most sites list deep scratching as a four.

Not trying to be difficult, we all sell stuff. However we need to rely on honest ratings when dealing with each other.
Here is an example of what an 8 should be according to an ebay seller:

Shows some visible signs of limited use or "shop wear" but is in fantastic shape and has been exceptionally well maintained. If you look really close, you just may see some minor and very faint cosmetic blemishes (e.g., light scuffing and/or scratching...often times from clubs hitting one another within a bag), but overall, the luster of new is still very much alive.

[tickyboy]

That little 'nick' mark does change the grove configuration/face of the wedge though. Does that not make it illegal accoridng to the rules of golf?
I seriously doubt that

Ok then, trying to sell 6/10 CG10s whose grooves still spin the ball great.


I'll package these with the pro platinum laguna 2.5 I'm trying to sell as well for $225 shipped.