Check out this article. Stableford, I know you're a big Wilson fan. Looks like they're going to make some high end products.
Collapse
Announcement
No announcement yet.
Collapse
Wilson/Staff comes out with new target market
X
-
Wilson/Staff comes out with new target market
"Bessie Braddock: Sir, you are drunk.
Churchill: And you, madam, are ugly. But in the morning, I shall be sober."
Winston ChurchillTags: None
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ego WoodsB4 they change all their clubs, they should invest some of that money in making a better ball....man their balls suck......
My first set of clubs was a set of Wilsons - handme downs from my dad who played in the 70s. They were musclebacks with really harsh steel shafts. I still have them in the basement. I take them to the range once a year, just to make myself appreciate advancement in golf technology.
Comment
-
Originally posted by malarkyI think the r&d costs for clubs is cheaper than for balls. You'd have to sell a lot of balls to recoup the type of $ that goes into the best balls. Not sure where Wilson ranks, but I'm certain their market share is a but a small fraction. Tough to compete against the Titleists (Titleist/Pinnacle), and the Callaways (Callaway/TopFlite/BenHogan).
My first set of clubs was a set of Wilsons - handme downs from my dad who played in the 70s. They were musclebacks with really harsh steel shafts. I still have them in the basement. I take them to the range once a year, just to make myself appreciate advancement in golf technology.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EmsThat'll be interesting. I'm curious to see how my guy friends would do with clubs from the 70's, before all the fancy technology. If I was a better player, I'd wonder how much those clubs would change my game or distance.
Comment
Receive email offers from TGN
Collapse
Comment