The gang was all in Orlando for the president’s re-election kickoff, and his old 2016 foe was foremost on his mind. Whether that is a winning formula for 2020 remains to be seen.
Well I don't mind a politician changing their mind.
But when it is done at the very last minute, that demonstrates a lack of forethought and preparation.
It was far from an excellent reply, it was a history lesson I didn't need. I meant people that are North American and Western European citizens. There is no place in the world more open, accepting, or tolerant as the western world - not in asian majority countries, black majority countries, Hispanic countries, and especially not in Arab majority countries. The west isn't perfect, but its significantly better by every metric than anywhere else in the world. We shouldn't just strive to be better than the rest of the world, we should strive to be as best as we can be. Does treating races of people differently based on history they had no influence or control over qualify as being better? I am arguing no. Every time that group identity has trumped individual identity, it has led to racial, ethnic, or religious violence, discrimination, and bigotry. Using group identity to combat group identity (neo-nazis, white supremacists, etc) is stupidity at best. Call out racists where you see them, and do your part in stopping discrimination in any form.
The idea that we can't 'take' things from people because of an immutable characteristics, but at the same time we should 'give' things to people based on that same characteristic is a fallacy.
Your post said this:
Mainly because most North American and Western Europe people had acknowledged for decades that there is no value in group identity.
When did people who aren't part of a white majority acknowledge that there is no value in group identity?
I won't dissect the rest of your "we're better than the rest of the world" post, because it has already been addressed, and I think it speaks for itself anyway, on multiple levels.
When did people who aren't part of a white majority acknowledge that there is no value in group identity?
I won't dissect the rest of your "we're better than the rest of the world" post, because it has already been addressed, and I think it speaks for itself anyway, on multiple levels.
The other question is, "Would we be better than the rest of the world without active pushes for minority rights (and yes, even affirmative action-type programs)?". One can certainly debate when the pendulum has swung too far, but claiming that we are slightly better than some places that still show outward racism towards minorities is no reason to put the subject to rest.
The other question is, "Would we be better than the rest of the world without active pushes for minority rights (and yes, even affirmative action-type programs)?". One can certainly debate when the pendulum has swung too far, but claiming that we are slightly better than some places that still show outward racism towards minorities is no reason to put the subject to rest.
Comment